Abstract:
Since the early years of activation and workfare in the 1990s, the use of welfare conditionality
and benefit sanctions has been proposed among the necessary solutions to ensure the
efficiency of welfare policy by reinforcing individual economic incentives. Using rich
administrative registers from Norway, we produce micro-level quantitative evidence on
compulsory activation for young recipients of social assistance. The empirical challenge is that
activation through the threat of benefit sanctions is not a feature that unambiguously emerges
from observational data, except for when sanctions indeed take place and benefits are
reduced. To overcome this barrier, we introduce a novel methodology to identify individual-
level effects of activation on young welfare recipients, exploiting municipal variation in the
introduction of compulsory activation. More precisely, we study whether individuals who are
residents in municipalities that have introduced compulsory activation display a stronger
relationship between their labor market status (activation) and their benefit size (because of
the threat of sanctions being in place) compared to individuals residing in municipalities
where activation has not been made compulsory. Our results show that there is no different
relationship between social assistance benefits and passive labor market status for individuals
living in municipalities that practice activation compared with individuals residing in
municipalities in which activation is not yet mandatory. In other words, there is no visible
effect of (the threat of) sanctions for passive recipients.
Citation:
Smedsvik, B & Iacono, R. (2022). '(In)visible sanctions: micro-level evidence on compulsory activation for young welfare recipients'. INET Oxford Working Paper No. 2022-24.