Project Leader / Primary Investigator

J. Doyne Farmer


Energy technology portfolios

We are considering how to build portfolios of clean energy technologies, with the aim of accelerating the transition to a zero carbon economy. Large, targeted investments in just a few promising energy technologies can spur very rapid improvements, with some risk of failure, while diversified investments over many possible technologies can increase the chance of finding superior options in future. This work uses techniques from quantitative finance and statistics to characterise this exploration/exploitation trade-off and find the optimal technically feasible energy technology mix for a fast, low cost transition to a sustainable system.

Predictability of energy transition progress

We are evaluating the predictability of technological progress in energy technologies. Using evidence from a range of different technologies, we are developing methods to produce distributional forecasts, showing not only the median prediction but also the uncertainty surrounding the future costs of energy technologies.

Accelerating the energy transition

We are considering how to build portfolios of clean energy technologies, with the aim of accelerating the transition to a zero carbon economy. We have obtained a quantitative understanding of the degree to which some technologies improve much faster than others, and how exploiting these differences to properly take technological progress into account can accelerate the green energy transition. This work uses techniques from quantitative finance and statistics to characterise this exploration/exploitation trade-off and find the optimal technically feasible energy technology mix for a fast, low cost transition to a sustainable system. This project is supported by Partners For a New Economy (P4NE)

Forecasting technological progress

Innovation is the dominant factor underpinning economic growth, and is essential for sustainability and the clean energy transition. Our goal is to develop models for technological evolution that can provide a foundation for a theory of economic growth and allow us to make clear recommendations regarding the best technological investments for sustainability transitions. To this end, we have developed time series forecasting methods and network models which we use to analyse performance curves and the large historical records of patenting activity to map the evolution of technological ecosystems.

We have found that in many technologies, the rates of progress are sufficiently persistent to be used for forecasting purposes. We have developed methods to quantify uncertainty associated with such predictions, allowing us to design investment portfolios that balance the need to diversify to reduce uncertainty and the need for specialisation to reap the benefits of increasing returns. In contrast to fossil fuels, the prices of key renewable energy sources decline more if we invest in them, so phasing out fossil fuels in favour of clean energy sources may be costly in the short term but will lead to higher benefits in the future.

We have also developed network models that can leverage patent data to understand the relationships between technologies. We found that there are relatively independent clusters of renewable energy sources, suggesting that within a cluster, progress in each technology benefits the others. For instance, patents in hydro energy may also be helpful for further developing wind technologies, but not for nuclear or biofuels. On the forecasting side, we have shown that it is possible to produce better forecasts of future patenting when using models that take into account these interdependencies.



Funders include:

Baillie Gifford, BEIS, IARPA, Partners for a New Economy, Oxford Martin School Programme on Post-Carbon Transition


Recent Publications

Jul 2023
Journal
Technology and jobs: A systematic literature review
in Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Kerstin Hötte ,  Melline Somers ,  Angelos Theodorakopoulos
May 2023
INET Working Paper
Feb 2023
Journal
Sept 2022
Journal
Empirically grounded technology forecasts and the energy transition
in Joule
Rupert Way ,  Matthew Ives ,  Penny Mealy ,  J. Doyne Farmer
Aug 2022
Journal
Knowledge for a warmer world: A patent analysis of climate change adaptation technologies
in Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Kerstin Hötte ,  Su Jung Jee
Jul 2022
Journal
Can Stimulating Demand Drive Costs Down? World War II as a Natural Experiment
in The Journal of Economic History
François Lafond ,  Diana Greenwald ,  J. Doyne Farmer
Jul 2021
Journal
Comparing expert elicitation and model-based probabilistic technology cost forecasts for the energy transition
in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Jing Meng ,  Rupert Way ,  Elena Verdolini ,  Laura Diaz Anadon
Jan 2021
Journal
The rise of science in low-carbon energy technologies
in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Kerstin Hötte ,  Anton Pichler ,  François Lafond
Mar 2020
INET Working Paper
No.2020-04 - Technological interdependencies predict innovation dynamics
Anton Pichler ,  François Lafond ,  J. Doyne Farmer
Apr 2019
Journal
Wright meets Markowitz: How standard portfolio theory changes when assets are technologies following experience curves
in Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control
J. Doyne Farmer ,  Fabrizio Lillo ,  François Lafond ,  Rupert Way ,  Valentyn Panchenko
Jan 2019
Journal
Long-run dynamics of the U.S. patent classification system
in Journal of Evolutionary Economics
François Lafond ,  Daniel Kim
Mar 2018
Journal
How well do experience curves predict technological progress? A method for making distributional forecasts
in Technological Forecasting and Social Change
J. Doyne Farmer ,  François Lafond ,  Aimee Gotway Bailey ,  Jan David Bakker ,  Dylan Rebois ,  Rubina Zadourian ,  Patrick McSharry
Feb 2018
Journal
Early identification of important patents through network centrality
in Technological Forecasting and Social Change
François Lafond ,  Manuel Sebastian Mariani ,  Matúš Medo
Apr 2016
Journal
How Predictable is Technological Progress?
in Research Policy
J. Doyne Farmer ,  François Lafond